I read with great interest a letter and leaflet sent to me by Jamie Briggs, Member for Mayo following my application for a postal vote.
The promises were very appealing - repaying debt, stopping taxes and stopping "the boats" not to mention "doing the right thing", but it made me realise that no where in the letter were any details of exactly how this was going to be accomplished.
For example, in order to repay Labor's massive debt before my children are grandparents, one would assume that money must be acquired from somewhere. Certainly, governments can reduce their own spending but any thinking person would come to the conclusion that the money will be raised either through increased taxes or by selling what few assets the Australian public possess.
Stopping the boats is also of great concern to many voters, yet the letter is again short on detail. There are many ways to "stop a boat". Do the Liberals intend to use millions in Australian taxes to theoretically "bribe" a foreign nation to house these boat people for a few months until we fly them the rest of the way? Or will millions be sent to dictatorships overseas to deal with the issue at home? Perhaps "stopping the boats" involves our own navy?
Regardless of the questions and the lack of detail, at least we can be assured that Mr. Briggs and the Liberals intend to "do the right thing" - but again, like beauty, that is all in the eye of the beholder.
14 August, 2010
29 July, 2010
Minimal choice
29th July 2010
Although an independent candidate for the rural seat of Mayo, I was most disappointed at the announcement by the Nationals in SA of their decision to not contest any seats in this state.
Admittedly, on more than one occasion I have criticised the position taken by Nationals leadership on a variety of issues in the Stock Journal. It has been disapppointing the party's leadership has been silent on issues such as the financial burden on farmers stemming from the former government's debt forgiveness for Iraq, population pressure on arable land, the threats to primary producers' livelihoods posed by poorly planned Free Trade Agreements, WTO dictatorial attitudes and reduced quarantine regulations, not to mention the general impression that the leadership would prefer to keep urban based Liberals on side rather than speak out in defence of regional communities.
However, despite faults with interstate leadership, no one can doubt the connection and loyalty the grassroots Nationals membership have towards their communities and their first hand understanding of the invaluable role played by primary producers in the economic welfare of our nation.
This has been clearly supported by the calibre of candidates the Party has often produced, as could be seen by the performance of people such as Deb Thiele in previous elections.
One can understand the desire to conserve resources for a solid campaign effort in future, but the decision by the local Nationals to not contest one seat or even provide a Senate team to give regional South Australians a choice and to hopefully stimulate some debate on issues of concern to us leaves the democratic process so much poorer as a result.
Although an independent candidate for the rural seat of Mayo, I was most disappointed at the announcement by the Nationals in SA of their decision to not contest any seats in this state.
Admittedly, on more than one occasion I have criticised the position taken by Nationals leadership on a variety of issues in the Stock Journal. It has been disapppointing the party's leadership has been silent on issues such as the financial burden on farmers stemming from the former government's debt forgiveness for Iraq, population pressure on arable land, the threats to primary producers' livelihoods posed by poorly planned Free Trade Agreements, WTO dictatorial attitudes and reduced quarantine regulations, not to mention the general impression that the leadership would prefer to keep urban based Liberals on side rather than speak out in defence of regional communities.
However, despite faults with interstate leadership, no one can doubt the connection and loyalty the grassroots Nationals membership have towards their communities and their first hand understanding of the invaluable role played by primary producers in the economic welfare of our nation.
This has been clearly supported by the calibre of candidates the Party has often produced, as could be seen by the performance of people such as Deb Thiele in previous elections.
One can understand the desire to conserve resources for a solid campaign effort in future, but the decision by the local Nationals to not contest one seat or even provide a Senate team to give regional South Australians a choice and to hopefully stimulate some debate on issues of concern to us leaves the democratic process so much poorer as a result.
05 July, 2010
Profiteering in supermarkets?
5th July 2010
Like most Australians, I certainly would not begrudge primary producers displaying signs of relief at the news of lamb tipping the $5/kg mark and celebrating some degree of good fortune.
Many Australian consumers, particularly those in urban areas, do not appreciate the work that goes into running a property nor the many factors that can have a negative effect on the farmer's bottom line.
However, as a person also involved in the retail sector I cannot understand how some supermarkets are charging consumers between $27 and (according to reports on ABCs Landline) over $41/kg for lamb!
Certainly, in a relatively free market, a product can be offered for any price a retailer chooses and the so called "unseen guiding hand of the market" will dictate whether the venture is successful. One expects there to be a mark up to cover the costs of transport, processing and power in supermarkets to keep the meat fresh, but surely such a difference in pricing indicates nothing more than blatant profiteering?
The prices demanded by the retail sector are not a true indication of the price paid to the producer of the good. Again, it may be considered an economic heresy in today's enlightened age, but isn't some form of guideline required here?
The price consumers see on the packet goes a long way to the influencing the position in which they imagine our farmers to be. They hear there is a shortage of lamb and see $41/kg in the meat cabinet and assume the farmers are driving new 4WDs and sunning themselves each year on a beach in the Bahamas.
Supermarkets need to be made accountable to both their consumers and to the supplier of their product, either through the pressure of a primary industry representative body with some teeth, or by the actions of an educated consumer-preferably a combination of both.
Like most Australians, I certainly would not begrudge primary producers displaying signs of relief at the news of lamb tipping the $5/kg mark and celebrating some degree of good fortune.
Many Australian consumers, particularly those in urban areas, do not appreciate the work that goes into running a property nor the many factors that can have a negative effect on the farmer's bottom line.
However, as a person also involved in the retail sector I cannot understand how some supermarkets are charging consumers between $27 and (according to reports on ABCs Landline) over $41/kg for lamb!
Certainly, in a relatively free market, a product can be offered for any price a retailer chooses and the so called "unseen guiding hand of the market" will dictate whether the venture is successful. One expects there to be a mark up to cover the costs of transport, processing and power in supermarkets to keep the meat fresh, but surely such a difference in pricing indicates nothing more than blatant profiteering?
The prices demanded by the retail sector are not a true indication of the price paid to the producer of the good. Again, it may be considered an economic heresy in today's enlightened age, but isn't some form of guideline required here?
The price consumers see on the packet goes a long way to the influencing the position in which they imagine our farmers to be. They hear there is a shortage of lamb and see $41/kg in the meat cabinet and assume the farmers are driving new 4WDs and sunning themselves each year on a beach in the Bahamas.
Supermarkets need to be made accountable to both their consumers and to the supplier of their product, either through the pressure of a primary industry representative body with some teeth, or by the actions of an educated consumer-preferably a combination of both.
18 May, 2010
Mining super tax could cost Australians a lot
18th May 2010
The proposed mining super tax could possibly cost the Australian people a lot more than the loss of investment and local jobs.
The implementation of such a scheme could quite likely leave the Australian taxpayer open to compensation payments to foreign owned mining companies, under Bilateral Investment Treaties signed with countries such as China.
BITs are used to protect foreign investors from the actions of the other signatory state which could potentially affect the value of their investments. When one considers the involvement of China's Chinalco in our mining sector and the fact that BHP and Rio Tinto are 40% and 70% foreign owned respectively-Australian taxpayers have cause for concern.
Rudd may well be on moral high ground when he declares that Australians have a right to a greater share of our nation's resources, but he might want to consider reclaiming a degree of national sovereignty first and removing us from the myriad of Free Trade Agreements our governments have shackled us to first.
The proposed mining super tax could possibly cost the Australian people a lot more than the loss of investment and local jobs.
The implementation of such a scheme could quite likely leave the Australian taxpayer open to compensation payments to foreign owned mining companies, under Bilateral Investment Treaties signed with countries such as China.
BITs are used to protect foreign investors from the actions of the other signatory state which could potentially affect the value of their investments. When one considers the involvement of China's Chinalco in our mining sector and the fact that BHP and Rio Tinto are 40% and 70% foreign owned respectively-Australian taxpayers have cause for concern.
Rudd may well be on moral high ground when he declares that Australians have a right to a greater share of our nation's resources, but he might want to consider reclaiming a degree of national sovereignty first and removing us from the myriad of Free Trade Agreements our governments have shackled us to first.
15 April, 2010
Foreign apples put our local fruit industry at risk
15th April 2010
It comes as no surprise the World Trade Organization has finally dictated New Zealand apples must be allowed into our market, especially considering the consistent push by Bio Security Australia to bring us to this situation, despite repeated protests by local producers.
As outrageous as this decision is given the fact that it puts at risk an industry worth $50million locally and $500million nationally, it also raises a number of very important questions.
Producers have a right to know if the former and highly inadequate inspection guidelines stipulated by Biosecurity Australia,including the need for a single inspection of apples and the acceptance of apples harvested from trees actually showing signs of fireblight have been overturned in the interests of local producers' livelihoods.
Australians also have a right to ask why our politicians remain silent on an issue of national interest? Their silence is conspicuous and an insult to the efforts and diligence shown by regional Australians to create a successful industry with an enviable reputation as a clean green provider of high quality produce.
Their silence appears to speak volumes in regards to their penchant for economic rationalist dogma and their total disdain for their constituents.
Furthermore, can the government reassure local producers they will be compensated for any economic hardship encountered should their properties become infected due to this ridiculous decision? Perhaps they believe local taxpayers' will have no problem footing the bill to keep foreign producers happy, or alternatively producers are expected to pay higher insurance premiums to cover the expected loss?
Australian primary producers make an invaluable contribution to our nation's economy, through the millions in export dollars, the provision of employment and creation of regional businesses to the simple fact they feed our nation. For too long they have had their interests ignored and betrayed- perhaps this recent decision is an indication it is time for a change.
It comes as no surprise the World Trade Organization has finally dictated New Zealand apples must be allowed into our market, especially considering the consistent push by Bio Security Australia to bring us to this situation, despite repeated protests by local producers.
As outrageous as this decision is given the fact that it puts at risk an industry worth $50million locally and $500million nationally, it also raises a number of very important questions.
Producers have a right to know if the former and highly inadequate inspection guidelines stipulated by Biosecurity Australia,including the need for a single inspection of apples and the acceptance of apples harvested from trees actually showing signs of fireblight have been overturned in the interests of local producers' livelihoods.
Australians also have a right to ask why our politicians remain silent on an issue of national interest? Their silence is conspicuous and an insult to the efforts and diligence shown by regional Australians to create a successful industry with an enviable reputation as a clean green provider of high quality produce.
Their silence appears to speak volumes in regards to their penchant for economic rationalist dogma and their total disdain for their constituents.
Furthermore, can the government reassure local producers they will be compensated for any economic hardship encountered should their properties become infected due to this ridiculous decision? Perhaps they believe local taxpayers' will have no problem footing the bill to keep foreign producers happy, or alternatively producers are expected to pay higher insurance premiums to cover the expected loss?
Australian primary producers make an invaluable contribution to our nation's economy, through the millions in export dollars, the provision of employment and creation of regional businesses to the simple fact they feed our nation. For too long they have had their interests ignored and betrayed- perhaps this recent decision is an indication it is time for a change.
23 February, 2010
Immigration vetting needed
23rd February 2010
The penchant held by successive governments for wasting taxpayer funds never ceases to surprise me.
Recent reports inform us that we will soon be permitted to read the new White Paper on a study into the threat posed by home-grown terrorism and the alarming trend of locals being recruited by so called extremists to Jihad against our culture.
The report has spurred the government to announce it will allocate $70 million towards improved vetting of prospective migrants.
Perhaps this could have been avoided entirely if successive governments had listened to large sections of the Australian constituency who have expressed concern about the issue of immigration levels and it's composition, rather than sweeping the issue under the carpet and denigrating their concerns as nothing more than xenophobic hysteria.
The penchant held by successive governments for wasting taxpayer funds never ceases to surprise me.
Recent reports inform us that we will soon be permitted to read the new White Paper on a study into the threat posed by home-grown terrorism and the alarming trend of locals being recruited by so called extremists to Jihad against our culture.
The report has spurred the government to announce it will allocate $70 million towards improved vetting of prospective migrants.
Perhaps this could have been avoided entirely if successive governments had listened to large sections of the Australian constituency who have expressed concern about the issue of immigration levels and it's composition, rather than sweeping the issue under the carpet and denigrating their concerns as nothing more than xenophobic hysteria.
13 February, 2010
Royalties for Regions
13th February 2010
I was quite impressed by the recent letter from new Nationals leader, Jacky Abbott.
It is indeed heartening to see the Nationals grab a policy and running with it in the hope that a more equitable distribution of our states' wealth will come to regional Australia.
Royalties for Regions sounds promising, but how much will regional SA get following downturns in revenue from mining operations in our state in future? Do the Nationals intend to lock regional funding to the fluctuations of an unpredictable mining sector attracting ever more foreign control?
Given the leadership of the National Party's track record of ignoring, even betraying the interests of those of us working in regional areas (as we have witnessed following their silence on the Iraqi debt forgiveness, the Howard Government's attempts to change quarantine standards to allow imported foods and the belated defence of primary producers on the issue of property rights), I can understand why they are leaping at a program which appears to have brought benefits to our counterparts in WA.
However, the devil could well be in the detail for such schemes and I look forward to assurances from Nationals' leadership regional SA will not in fact be worse off should the bottom fall out of our very poor excuse for a mining boom in this state!
Should this eventuate, what is their fall back plan to ensure adequate funding continues to regional development, hospitals and our schools?
I was quite impressed by the recent letter from new Nationals leader, Jacky Abbott.
It is indeed heartening to see the Nationals grab a policy and running with it in the hope that a more equitable distribution of our states' wealth will come to regional Australia.
Royalties for Regions sounds promising, but how much will regional SA get following downturns in revenue from mining operations in our state in future? Do the Nationals intend to lock regional funding to the fluctuations of an unpredictable mining sector attracting ever more foreign control?
Given the leadership of the National Party's track record of ignoring, even betraying the interests of those of us working in regional areas (as we have witnessed following their silence on the Iraqi debt forgiveness, the Howard Government's attempts to change quarantine standards to allow imported foods and the belated defence of primary producers on the issue of property rights), I can understand why they are leaping at a program which appears to have brought benefits to our counterparts in WA.
However, the devil could well be in the detail for such schemes and I look forward to assurances from Nationals' leadership regional SA will not in fact be worse off should the bottom fall out of our very poor excuse for a mining boom in this state!
Should this eventuate, what is their fall back plan to ensure adequate funding continues to regional development, hospitals and our schools?
20 January, 2010
Protect local producers to ensure a decent national standard of living
20th January 2010
I listened with interest as our PM urged Australians to work “harder and smarter” to ensure our standard of living.
As a former manufacturing worker, I recall hearing the same exhortations from our previous Labor leaders-Hawke and Keating. The catchword back then under a new style of government was “corporatization” and while our leaders were being wined and dined by the high flyers in business, those of us in what was left of our nation’s manufacturing sector did indeed work harder and smarter.
Reforms to the workplace led to us accepting changes in conditions ensuring “flexibility” and rewarded for our efforts with payrises between 1.25 and 3%. The changes, we were assured, would ensure job stability and the ability to compete on the world stage.
Regardless of our efforts, department after department were packed up and sent off to China.;
Perhaps if Australians wish to ensure their standard of living, we could begin by electing governments interested in protecting Australian industry and primary producers. Protecting Australian jobs is defending our standard of living.
I listened with interest as our PM urged Australians to work “harder and smarter” to ensure our standard of living.
As a former manufacturing worker, I recall hearing the same exhortations from our previous Labor leaders-Hawke and Keating. The catchword back then under a new style of government was “corporatization” and while our leaders were being wined and dined by the high flyers in business, those of us in what was left of our nation’s manufacturing sector did indeed work harder and smarter.
Reforms to the workplace led to us accepting changes in conditions ensuring “flexibility” and rewarded for our efforts with payrises between 1.25 and 3%. The changes, we were assured, would ensure job stability and the ability to compete on the world stage.
Regardless of our efforts, department after department were packed up and sent off to China.;
Perhaps if Australians wish to ensure their standard of living, we could begin by electing governments interested in protecting Australian industry and primary producers. Protecting Australian jobs is defending our standard of living.
06 January, 2010
Multiculturalism Advocates' Campaign of Contempt
6th January 2010
All is not well in the Ivory Tower. When the arrogant elite begin to have concerns about changes in society's attitudes and it becomes evident that the general population are once again thinking for themselves, the poor hacks in some sections of our media cartel swing into action and begin the campaign of contempt.
Lashings of guilt inducing self loathing vitriol splash across our screens and the pages of our papers, the very same papers we are told reflect the attitudes of the nation and supply us with the truth. Time to herd the sheeple back into the pens and make them accept the condition determined for them and their grandchildren.
Judging by the columns served up for consumption by the Adelaide Advertiser the last two days, it would appear our "intellectual keepers" have suddenly realised the brumbies are bolting and are frantically falling over themselves to shut the gate before too much damage is done to their cozy situation. The tactics used were obvious and printed to coincide with the concern by authorities regarding the recent stabbing of a young Indian in the Yarraville area.
Of concern is the fact that once again the "wannabe intelligentsia" work themselves into a frenzy even before the facts are known. As soon as someone of non European heritage is assaulted or robbed, the perpetrators are naturally assumed to be White-and none are worse than those nasty Anglo Saxons, after all, as former SA Premier Don Dunstan once proudly declared, Anglo Saxons are the biggest race of mongrels to walk the Earth.....
The Advertiser sent their star Queen of Cultural Self Loathing, Tory Shepherd "Straying From the Flock" (as she trumpets in a most self satisfied way) in to soften up those readers who might just be thinking of seeing things in a different way.
It took almost ten paragraphs of inane drivel about car stickers for Ms. Shepherd to warm to her subject- being what a bunch of narrow minded, insensitive, moronic yobs we Australians are.
Lamenting about the growing number of "Australia. If you don't love it-leave" stickers on the back of cars (obviously sported by morons who don't understand the whole benefit of being part of the Global Village. Pack rapes by gangs of Moslem youths, stabbings and car jackings by gangs of "alienated" African youths, heroin deaths brought to your neighbourhood by your friendly local Triad members, unemployment as factory workers watch their jobs go overseas, farms quarantined due to the importation of produce from developing nations with poor production standards-just to name a few-but of course these don't affect you if you live on the leafy side of town), Ms. Shepherd proceeded to attack her fellow Australians who air their views on the internet.
Internet sites, including a Facebook group which at one point had 65,000 members but "now only has around 500 after some sort of intervention" (well, we guess you could call hacking by rabid far left activists opposed to freedom of speech "some sort of intervention" Tory) were criticised by Ms. Shepherd as having a "mishmash of claims" and advocating a "Monolithic Australian culture, as though it is something enshrined in law". Well no, Tory, but perhaps it might be advantageous if it were supported by both the government and the education system rather than undermined.
Then again, we shouldn't be too harsh in our criticism of Ms. Shepherd's rambling thoughts. This is, after all, the same woman who seems to revel in an endless campaign to denigrate Western society's contribution to the world in general, belittle our culture's Christian heritage at every opportunity and hop on any controversial bandwagon that might pass her cluttered cubicle in the hallowed building that is occupied by the Advertiser. Right to die, right to kill, right to same sex marriages, where she'll draw the line is anybody's guess, but those of us wanting to protect the country we love know there is one right she won't defend- the right to free speech and freedom of expression. She just can't help herself.
Having done her job at convincing the reader that they belong to an odious group of moronic narrow minded human beings who have contributed nothing to the world and can lay claim to nothing, at least to the best of her ability, the Advertiser served up an opinion piece from one Verma Vinay, a Sydney resident whose contributions to our sterile and unproductive culture include being a "poet, author and freelance journalist".
Makes one feel quite inadequate.
Mr. Vinay began his column with a list of mildly imaginative, albeit dated, racist chants as proof of our nation's sinister racist underbelly. Mr. Vinay condemned our apparently "stringent but ineffective" anti discrimination laws for not deterring opponents to multiculturalism (clearly the likes of Mr. Vinay won't be happy until we see those nasty rednecks turned out of their homes as their assets are seized and the breadwinner is gaoled for a decade or more to silence him or her, leaving the family without a parent to instruct innocent children in the evils of outmoded ideals such as traditional values and national pride?).
Of course Mr. Vinay's self righteous rant didn't put him off the need to tell us the racial heritage of one "strapping Anglo Saxon rugby player" who was fined for supposed racial taunts on the field. This was followed by an awful indulgence in racial stereotyping with the claim "Indian doctors are the only ones open on a weekend". Oh really? I must tell my narrow minded, culturally sterile and unproductive European doctor to shut up her operations on the weekend-stupid girl.
Of course, Indian society is always welcoming of foreign culture and beliefs. We'll just ignore the barbaric activities in the past by followers of a Hindu Goddess which involved ritual strangulation, and more recently, the burning of Christian missionaries and their families in cars and homes by devout Hindus. Still, as Mr. Vinay assures us, ignorance breeds fear. Perhaps it was fear that motivated someone to send a letter to our Party P.O Box several years ago, urging us to continue our stand against Moslem immigration. The man claimed he was a Sikh residing in Adelaide.
Mr. Vinay then turned his attention on the media for supposedly giving "cursory coverage" of recent attacks on Indians here in Australia. Well, I am not sure exactly what Mr. Vinay was expecting (perhaps loop coverage as one witnessed following the 9/11 attack?), but it certainly seemed mention was made on every news bulletin on every station. The only criticism I have of the reports were lack of detail. The reports lacked detail because no one knows who the perpetrators were, their motives or their racial heritage. In fact, when the attacks began I remember hearing one report make the mistake of mentioning hostilities between the Indian and African communities.
Never let the entire story get in the way of a good campaign of self hatred.
Unfortunately for the likes of Ms. Shepherd and Mr. Vinay, Australians have begun to awaken as a people. We are tired of the endless campaign by elitist, self righteous, dictatorial advocates of the borderless world to instill in us a sense of undeserved guilt and self loathing. The endless campaign to make us think we have contributed nothing to the world, have no value and would be nothing without the contribution of those who have no cultural, ethical or physical similarity to us.
It has nothing to do with racial superiority and everything to do with rights, the same rights that belong to all people in the world, the right to territory, self determination , sovereignty and identity.
I would like to close with a few words regarding Ms. Shepherd's final paragraph. "Australia is now-and will always be, despite the best efforts of the racists (presumably any Aussie who doesn't fall into line with her perverted cultural vision) and the politicians who pander to them-multicultural. That's Australia- if you don't love it, leave".
What Ms. Shepherd fails to realise is this process of undermining the identity and values we seek to preserve is underway throughout the Western world. To where would she have us go? When the West "invaded" non Caucasian nations, it was declared imperialism and the inhabitants of those lands eventually expelled Westerners and declared self sovereignty (with all the benefits). We'll gloss over the tactics used by the likes of Kenya's Mau Mau and other such groups which were encouraged in their campaign for self determination by people such as Ms. Shepherd, but when Westerners seek to protect their identity, their values and desire a territory in which to develop these cultural traits, they're supposedly "racist".
Ms. Shepherd and her ilk need to realise that we indeed do love Australia, in the same way as all people love their lands, as is right and entirely natural. What she also needs to realise is, we won't be leaving.
All is not well in the Ivory Tower. When the arrogant elite begin to have concerns about changes in society's attitudes and it becomes evident that the general population are once again thinking for themselves, the poor hacks in some sections of our media cartel swing into action and begin the campaign of contempt.
Lashings of guilt inducing self loathing vitriol splash across our screens and the pages of our papers, the very same papers we are told reflect the attitudes of the nation and supply us with the truth. Time to herd the sheeple back into the pens and make them accept the condition determined for them and their grandchildren.
Judging by the columns served up for consumption by the Adelaide Advertiser the last two days, it would appear our "intellectual keepers" have suddenly realised the brumbies are bolting and are frantically falling over themselves to shut the gate before too much damage is done to their cozy situation. The tactics used were obvious and printed to coincide with the concern by authorities regarding the recent stabbing of a young Indian in the Yarraville area.
Of concern is the fact that once again the "wannabe intelligentsia" work themselves into a frenzy even before the facts are known. As soon as someone of non European heritage is assaulted or robbed, the perpetrators are naturally assumed to be White-and none are worse than those nasty Anglo Saxons, after all, as former SA Premier Don Dunstan once proudly declared, Anglo Saxons are the biggest race of mongrels to walk the Earth.....
The Advertiser sent their star Queen of Cultural Self Loathing, Tory Shepherd "Straying From the Flock" (as she trumpets in a most self satisfied way) in to soften up those readers who might just be thinking of seeing things in a different way.
It took almost ten paragraphs of inane drivel about car stickers for Ms. Shepherd to warm to her subject- being what a bunch of narrow minded, insensitive, moronic yobs we Australians are.
Lamenting about the growing number of "Australia. If you don't love it-leave" stickers on the back of cars (obviously sported by morons who don't understand the whole benefit of being part of the Global Village. Pack rapes by gangs of Moslem youths, stabbings and car jackings by gangs of "alienated" African youths, heroin deaths brought to your neighbourhood by your friendly local Triad members, unemployment as factory workers watch their jobs go overseas, farms quarantined due to the importation of produce from developing nations with poor production standards-just to name a few-but of course these don't affect you if you live on the leafy side of town), Ms. Shepherd proceeded to attack her fellow Australians who air their views on the internet.
Internet sites, including a Facebook group which at one point had 65,000 members but "now only has around 500 after some sort of intervention" (well, we guess you could call hacking by rabid far left activists opposed to freedom of speech "some sort of intervention" Tory) were criticised by Ms. Shepherd as having a "mishmash of claims" and advocating a "Monolithic Australian culture, as though it is something enshrined in law". Well no, Tory, but perhaps it might be advantageous if it were supported by both the government and the education system rather than undermined.
Then again, we shouldn't be too harsh in our criticism of Ms. Shepherd's rambling thoughts. This is, after all, the same woman who seems to revel in an endless campaign to denigrate Western society's contribution to the world in general, belittle our culture's Christian heritage at every opportunity and hop on any controversial bandwagon that might pass her cluttered cubicle in the hallowed building that is occupied by the Advertiser. Right to die, right to kill, right to same sex marriages, where she'll draw the line is anybody's guess, but those of us wanting to protect the country we love know there is one right she won't defend- the right to free speech and freedom of expression. She just can't help herself.
Having done her job at convincing the reader that they belong to an odious group of moronic narrow minded human beings who have contributed nothing to the world and can lay claim to nothing, at least to the best of her ability, the Advertiser served up an opinion piece from one Verma Vinay, a Sydney resident whose contributions to our sterile and unproductive culture include being a "poet, author and freelance journalist".
Makes one feel quite inadequate.
Mr. Vinay began his column with a list of mildly imaginative, albeit dated, racist chants as proof of our nation's sinister racist underbelly. Mr. Vinay condemned our apparently "stringent but ineffective" anti discrimination laws for not deterring opponents to multiculturalism (clearly the likes of Mr. Vinay won't be happy until we see those nasty rednecks turned out of their homes as their assets are seized and the breadwinner is gaoled for a decade or more to silence him or her, leaving the family without a parent to instruct innocent children in the evils of outmoded ideals such as traditional values and national pride?).
Of course Mr. Vinay's self righteous rant didn't put him off the need to tell us the racial heritage of one "strapping Anglo Saxon rugby player" who was fined for supposed racial taunts on the field. This was followed by an awful indulgence in racial stereotyping with the claim "Indian doctors are the only ones open on a weekend". Oh really? I must tell my narrow minded, culturally sterile and unproductive European doctor to shut up her operations on the weekend-stupid girl.
Of course, Indian society is always welcoming of foreign culture and beliefs. We'll just ignore the barbaric activities in the past by followers of a Hindu Goddess which involved ritual strangulation, and more recently, the burning of Christian missionaries and their families in cars and homes by devout Hindus. Still, as Mr. Vinay assures us, ignorance breeds fear. Perhaps it was fear that motivated someone to send a letter to our Party P.O Box several years ago, urging us to continue our stand against Moslem immigration. The man claimed he was a Sikh residing in Adelaide.
Mr. Vinay then turned his attention on the media for supposedly giving "cursory coverage" of recent attacks on Indians here in Australia. Well, I am not sure exactly what Mr. Vinay was expecting (perhaps loop coverage as one witnessed following the 9/11 attack?), but it certainly seemed mention was made on every news bulletin on every station. The only criticism I have of the reports were lack of detail. The reports lacked detail because no one knows who the perpetrators were, their motives or their racial heritage. In fact, when the attacks began I remember hearing one report make the mistake of mentioning hostilities between the Indian and African communities.
Never let the entire story get in the way of a good campaign of self hatred.
Unfortunately for the likes of Ms. Shepherd and Mr. Vinay, Australians have begun to awaken as a people. We are tired of the endless campaign by elitist, self righteous, dictatorial advocates of the borderless world to instill in us a sense of undeserved guilt and self loathing. The endless campaign to make us think we have contributed nothing to the world, have no value and would be nothing without the contribution of those who have no cultural, ethical or physical similarity to us.
It has nothing to do with racial superiority and everything to do with rights, the same rights that belong to all people in the world, the right to territory, self determination , sovereignty and identity.
I would like to close with a few words regarding Ms. Shepherd's final paragraph. "Australia is now-and will always be, despite the best efforts of the racists (presumably any Aussie who doesn't fall into line with her perverted cultural vision) and the politicians who pander to them-multicultural. That's Australia- if you don't love it, leave".
What Ms. Shepherd fails to realise is this process of undermining the identity and values we seek to preserve is underway throughout the Western world. To where would she have us go? When the West "invaded" non Caucasian nations, it was declared imperialism and the inhabitants of those lands eventually expelled Westerners and declared self sovereignty (with all the benefits). We'll gloss over the tactics used by the likes of Kenya's Mau Mau and other such groups which were encouraged in their campaign for self determination by people such as Ms. Shepherd, but when Westerners seek to protect their identity, their values and desire a territory in which to develop these cultural traits, they're supposedly "racist".
Ms. Shepherd and her ilk need to realise that we indeed do love Australia, in the same way as all people love their lands, as is right and entirely natural. What she also needs to realise is, we won't be leaving.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)